Header image
RNS Number : 1592X
Savannah Resources PLC
22 November 2017
 

 

Savannah Resources Plc / Index: AIM / Epic: SAV / Sector: Mining

 

22 November 2017

 

Savannah Resources Plc

Further Encouraging Lithium Results Returned from Mina do Barroso Lithium Project, Portugal

 

Savannah Resources plc (AIM: SAV) ('Savannah' or 'the Company'), the AIM quoted resource development company, is pleased to announce further results from the ongoing reverse circulation ('RC') drill programme for the Mina do Barroso Lithium Project ('Mina do Barroso' or the 'Project') in Portugal (Figure 1).  The drill programme, which is aimed at defining a JORC - 2012 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate, has returned significant intersections of lithium mineralisation.  To view the press release with the illustrative maps and diagrams please use the following link:

http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1592X_-2017-11-21.pdf

 

 

HIGHLIGHTS:

·    Completed a further 27 holes for 2,566m with assays for the first 11 holes confirming extensions to the existing mineralisation

·    Reservatorio Deposit: drilling significantly extends lithium mineralisation to over 400m strike length, with good down dip extensions of at least 150m.  Results from the second round of drilling to date include:

-     29m at 1.07% LiO from 43m in 17RESRC10

·    NOA Deposit: drilling has confirmed the presence of lithium mineralisation over a 100m strike length together with good down dip extensions of at least 50m.  Results received to date from the second round of drilling include:

-     13m at 1.19% LiO from 7m in 17NOARC03

·    The Reservatorio, Grandao and NOA deposits remain open along strike and down dip leaving excellent upside potential for all deposits

·    Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for Reservatorio expected by the end of 2017

·    Further mapping at five additional high priority targets, some with significant historical drill intersects, has also commenced to fast track the targets to drilling

·    Phase 2 of the Metallurgical Test Work programme is due to get underway at Nagrom in Perth by the end of November 2017

 

Savannah's CEO, David Archer said: "The drilling results to date continue to underscore the potential of the Mina do Barroso Project to be a strategic upstream feature in the European lithium value chain. From an investment perspective, we see the Project as the closest European analogue to the very successful Australian hard-rock, open cut mine developments which produce highly sought-after lithium spodumene concentrates for international markets.

 

"Drilling and metallurgical test work is ongoing and will be used to support an early scoping study around a potential mine development."

 

Figure 1. Mina do Barroso Project Summary Map showing prospects and 2017 drilling - see PDF link

 

Reservatorio

 

A further 12 drill holes for 1,322m have now been completed at Reservatorio. Assay results from the first six holes have now been received and have confirmed significant extensions to the already identified lithium mineralisation (Table 1-2 and Figure 2-3) in pegmatite, with mineralisation now defined along a 400m strike length and to at least 150m down dip confirming the potential for good depth extensions of the lithium mineralisation. Drilling in an area of faulting and shearing on the eastern part of the pegmatite has caused the pegmatite to become weathered resulting in some zones of near surface depletion. Further infill drilling is now required to further define these zones.

 

Table 1. Summarised downhole geology for recent Reservatorio Drilling

 

HOLE ID

SUMMARISED DOWNHOLE GEOLOGY

17RESRC09

Pegmatite/Schist 0-13m; Pegmatite/Schist 19-20m; Pegmatite 20-25m; Pegmatite/Schist 25-26m; Pegmatite/Schist 32-33m; Pegmatite 33-52m; Pegmatite/Schist 52-53m

17RESRC10

Pegmatite/Schist 19-21m; Pegmatite 21-35m; Pegmatite/Schist 35-37m; Pegmatite/Schist 39-40m; Pegmatite/Schist 42-43m; Pegmatite 43-56m; Pegmatite/Schist 56-58m; Pegmatite 58-72m; Pegmatite/Schist 75-80m

17RESRC11

Pegmatite/Schist 21-23m; Pegmatite/Schist 54-60m; Pegmatite 60-87m; Pegmatite/Schist 87-90m; Pegmatite 90-91m; Pegmatite/Schist 91-92m; Pegmatite/Schist 100-103m

17RESRC12

Pegmatite/Schist 30-31m; Pegmatite 31-66m; Pegmatite/Schist 66-67m

17RESRC13

Pegmatite/Schist 4-7m; Pegmatite 7-34m

17RESRC14

Pegmatite/Schist 16-19m; Pegmatite/Schist 33-36m; Pegmatite 36-42m; Pegmatite 47-66m; Pegmatite/Schist 66-68m

 

 

Table 2. Summary of drill results for Reservatorio reported at a 0.2% and 0.5% Li2O cut-off

 

Prospect

Hole ID

0.2% Li2O Cut Off

0.5% Li2O Cut Off

Reservatorio

17RESRC09

4m at 0.29% Li2O from 22m

11m @ 0.84% Li2O from 35m

 

 

14m @ 0.71% Li2O from 32m

1m @ 0.87% Li2O from 50m

 

 

4m at 0.34% Li2O from 49m

 

Reservatorio

17RESRC10

1m at 0.2% Li2O from 36m

29m @ 1.07% Li2O from 43m

 

 

29m @ 1.07% Li2O from 43m

2m @ 1.13% Li2O from 76m

 

 

4m @ 0.68% Li2O from 75m

 

Reservatorio

17RESRC11

37m @ 1.02% Li2O from 54m

35m @ 1.06% Li2O from 56m

Reservatorio

17RESRC12

1m at 0.21% Li2O from 35m

No Significant Results

 

 

8m at 0.22% Li2O from 53m

 

Reservatorio

17RESRC13

No Significant Results

No Significant Results

Reservatorio

17RESRC14

1m @ 0.59% Li2O from 39m

1m @ 0.59% Li2O from 39m

 

 

18m @ 0.75% Li2O from 47m

16m @ 0.79% Li2O from 48m

 

Figure 2. Summary of drilling at Reservatorio, together with historical drill holes and planned drill holes - see PDF link

 

Figure 3. Reservatorio: Cross Section through 17RESRC04, 17RESRC05 and 17RES07 (assays are still pending for 17RESRC18 and 17RESRC19) - see PDF link

 

Grandao

 

A further 10 drill holes for 860m (Figure 4) have been completed targeting the flat lying pegmatite body at Grandao. To date no results have been received for this drilling.

 

Figure 4. Summary of drilling at Grandao, with historical drill holes and planned drill holes - see PDF link

 

NOA

 

Initial drilling results from the NOA prospect have been encouraging with 10-15m wide zones of pegmatite being intersected to date at grades above 1.2% Li₂O over a strike length of 100m and a down dip depth of around 50m (Table 3-4, Figure 5). A further five RC holes are planned to test a further 200m of the strike of the NOA prospect focusing on areas where surface outcrop suggest widths of pegmatite over 20m may be present.

 

Table 3. Summarised downhole geology for recent NOA Drilling 

 

HOLE ID

SUMMARISED DOWNHOLE GEOLOGY

17NOARC01

Pegmatite/Schist 1-5m; Pegmatite 5-10m; Pegmatite/Schist 15-16m; Pegmatite 16-19m;
Pegmatite/Schist 19-20m; Pegmatite/Schist 23-24m; Pegmatite 24-31m; Pegmatite/Schist 31-33m;  Pegmatite 33-39m; Pegmatite/Schist 39-40m; Pegmatite 40-45m; Pegmatite/Schist 45-46m

17NOARC02

Pegmatite/Schist 25-29m; Pegmatite/Schist 64-65m; Pegmatite 65-68m

17NOARC03

Pegmatite/Schist 6-11m; Pegmatite 11-18m; Pegmatite/Schist 18-20m

17NOARC04

Pegmatite/Schist 22-23m; Pegmatite 23-24m; Pegmatite 24-25m; Pegmatite/Schist 45-46m; Pegmatite 46-56m; Pegmatite/Schist 56-57m

17NOARC05

Pegmatite/Schist 11-17m; Pegmatite/Schist 72-75m

 

 

Table 4. Summary of drill results for NOA reported at a 0.2% and 0.5% Li2O cut-off

 

Prospect

Hole ID

0.2% Li20 Cut Off

0.5% Li20 Cut Off

NOA

17NOARC01

7m @ 0.52% Li20 from 3m

3m @0.95@ Li20 from 5m

 

 

5m @ 0.3% Li20 from 15m

15m @ 0.78% Li20 from 31m

 

 

1m @ 0.25% Li20 from 23m

 

 

 

15m @ 0.78% Li20 from 31m

 

NOA

17NOARC02

3m @ 0.24% Li20 from 25m

2m @ 1.40% Li20 from 65m

 

 

4m @ 0.82% Li20 from 64m

 

NOA

17NOARC03

13m @ 1.19% Li20 from 7m

11m @ 1.34% Li20 from 7m

NOA

17NOARC04

2m @ 0.74% Li20 from 23m

2m @ 0.74% Li20 from 23m

 

 

11m @ 1.23% Li20 from 46m

10m @ 1.32% Li20 from 46m

NOA

17NOARC05

1m @ 0.21% Li20 from 72m

No significant results

 

 

Figure 5. Summary of drilling at NOA, with historical drill holes and planned drill holes - see PDF link

 

Drilling is continuing at both NOA and Grandao and a Mineral Resource Estimate for Reservatorio is expected to be delivered before the end of 2017.

 

Savannah has a 75% shareholding in Slipstream Resources Portugal Lda, which is the registered holder of the Mina do Barroso mining licence.

 

Competent Person and Regulatory Information

 

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based upon information compiled by Mr Dale Ferguson, Technical Director of Savannah Resources Limited. Mr Ferguson is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the December 2012 edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Ferguson consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based upon the information in the form and context in which it appears.

 

This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 596/2014.

**ENDS**

 

For further information please visit www.savannahresources.com or contact:

David Archer

Savannah Resources plc

Tel: 44 20 7117 2489

David Hignell / Gerry Beaney (Nominated Adviser)

Northland Capital Partners Ltd

Tel: 44 20 3861 6625

Christopher Raggett / Emily Morris (Joint Broker)

finnCap Ltd

Tel: 44 20 7220 0500

Jon Belliss

(Joint Broker)

Beaufort Securities Ltd

Tel: 44 20 7382 8300

Charlotte Page / Lottie Wadham

(Financial PR)

St Brides Partners Ltd

Tel: 44 20 7236 1177

 

 

About Savannah

We are a diversified resources group (AIM: SAV) with a portfolio of energy metals projects - lithium in Portugal and copper in Oman - together with the world-class Mutamba Heavy Mineral Sands Project in Mozambique, which is being developed in a consortium with the global major Rio Tinto. We are committed to serving the interests of our shareholders and to delivering outcomes that will improve the lives of our staff and the communities we work with.

 

APPENDIX 1 - JORC 2012 Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

·   Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

·     Reverse circulation (HQ size) samples were taken on either 1 intervals for pegmatite or 4m composites in surrounding schist. RC samples were collected in large plastic bags from an on-board rig splitter and a 4-6kg representative sample taken for analysis.

 

·   Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representatively and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

·     Drilling was conducted on a nominal 80m by 40m spacing based on geological targets using RC drilling technology, an industry standard drilling technique. Drilling rods are 3m long and 1 sample is taken for each rod interval.

·     Collar surveys are carried using hand held GPS with an accuracy to within 5m, and the z direction was determined by satellite derived elevation data and is accurate to less than a metre. 

·     A downhole survey for each hole was completed

 

·   Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

·   In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

·     The lithium mineralization is predominantly in the form of Spodumene-bearing pegmatites, the pegmatites are unzoned and vary in thickness from 15m-39m.

·     Down hole sampling is carried out on either a 1 or 4m interval from which 4-6kg of pulverized material (RC) was pulverized to produce a 50g charge for assaying

 

Drilling techniques

·   Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

·      RC drilling at a diameter of 120mm is a form of reverse circulation drilling requiring annular drill rods. Compressed air is pumped down the outer tube and the sample is collected from the open face drilling bit and blown up the inner tube.

Drill sample recovery

·   Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 

·      Field assessment of sample volume. A theoretical dried sample mass was estimated to be within the range of 18 kg to 24 Kg, 70% of samples are within the expected range. Lower than average sample recovery is recorded only for the very top of the drill hole due to air and sample losses into the surrounding soil

 

·   Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

·      RC drilling sample weights were monitored to ensure samples were maximized. Samples were carefully loaded into a splitter and split in the same manner ensuring that the sample split to be sent to the assay laboratories were in the range of 4-6kg.

 

·   Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

·      No obvious relationships

 

Logging

·   Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

·   Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

·   The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

·      RC holes were logged in the field at the time of sampling.

·      Each 1m sample interval was carefully homogenized and assessed for lithology, colour, grainsize, structure and mineralization.

·      A representative chip sample produced from RC drilling was washed and taken for each 1m sample and stored in a chip tray which was photographed

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

·   If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

·   If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

·      RC samples were split by the rotary splitter on the drill rig and sampled dry

 

·   For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

·      The sampling was conducted using industry standard techniques and were considered appropriate

 

·   Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representatively of samples.

·      The 4m composites were collected using a spear with the spear inserted into the bag at a high angle and pushed across the sample to maximise representatively of the sample

 

·   Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

·      Every effort was made to ensure that the samples were representative and not bias in anyway

 

·   Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

·      All samples were taken once they went through the on-board splitter from the drill rig. Depending on the rock types on average a 4-6kg sample was sent to the lab for analysis and the remaining material averaged 18-24kg and remains stored on site for any further analysis required

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

·   The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

·     Samples were received, sorted, labelled and dried

·      Samples were crushed to 70% less than 2mm, riffle split off 250g, pulverize split to better than 85% passing 75 microns and 5g was split of for assaying

·      The samples were analysed using ALS laboratories ME-MS89L Super Trace method which combines a sodium peroxide fusion with ICP-MS instrumentation utilizing collision/reaction cell technologies to provide the lowest detection limits available.

·      A prepared sample (0.2g) is added to sodium peroxide flux, mixed well and then fused in at 670°C. The resulting melt is cooled and then dissolved in 30% hydrochloric acid. This solution is then analysed by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry and the results are corrected for spectral inter-element interferences.

·      The final solution is then analysed by ICP-MS, with results corrected for spectral inter-element interferences.

 

·   For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

·      Not used

 

·   Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

·      Standards/blanks and duplicates we inserted on a 1:20 ratio for both to samples taken

·      Duplicate sample regime is used to monitor sampling methodology and homogeneity.

·     A powder chip tray for the entire hole is completed for both RC and RAB. A sub-sample is sieved from the large RC bags at site into chip trays over the pegmatite interval to assist in geological logging. These are photographed and kept on the central database

·     Routine QA/QC controls for the method ME-MS89L include Blanks, certified reference standards of Lithium and duplicate samples. Samples are assayed within runs or batches up to 40 samples. At the fusion stage that quality control samples are included together with the samples so all samples follow the same procedure until the end. Fused and diluted samples are prepared for ICP-MS analysis. ICP instrument is calibrated through appropriate certified standards solutions and interference corrections to achieve strict calibration fitting parameters. Each 40 samples run is assayed with 2 blanks, 2 certified standards and one duplicate samples and results are evaluated accordingly.

·     A QA/QC review of all information indicated that all assays were inside reasonable tolerance levels.

Verification of sampling and assaying

·   The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

·      All information was internally audited by company personnel

 

 

·   The use of twinned holes.

·      Several historical holes we twinned for comparison purposes with the modern drilling

 

·   Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

·     Savannah's experienced project geologists are supervised all processes.

·     All field data is entered into a custom log sheet and then into excel spreadsheets (supported by look-up tables) at site and subsequently validated as it is imported into the centralized Access database.

·     Hard copies of logs, survey and sampling data are stored in the local office and electronic data is stored on the main server.

 

·   Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

·      Results were reported as Li(ppm) and were converted to a percentage by dividing by 10,000 and then to Li2O% by multiplying by 2.153

Location of data points

·   Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

·   Specification of the grid system used.

·   Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

·      The coordinate of each drill hole was taken at the time of collecting using a handheld GPS with an accuracy of 5m.

·      The grid system used is WSG84

·     Topographic accuracy was /- 5m

Data spacing and distribution

·   Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

·   Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

·   Whether sample compositing has been applied.

·      Drilling was on a nominal 80m by 40m spacing and based on geological targets

·      Drill data is not currently at sufficient spacing to define a mineral resource.

·     Some samples were composited on a 4m basis based on geological criteria, these areas were all outside the pegmatite bodies where 1m sampling was completed

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

·   Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

·   If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

·      Drilling was orientated perpendicular to the known strike of the pegmatites

·      Drill holes we orientated at either -60 degrees or -90 degrees depending on the dip of the pegmatite in an attempt to get drill holes as close to true width as possible

Sample security

·   The measures taken to ensure sample security.

·      Samples were delivered to a courier and chain of custody is managed by Savannah.

Audits or reviews

·   The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

·      Internal company auditing

 

 

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

·   Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

·   The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area.

·      All work was completed inside the 100% owned Mina do Barroso project C-100

 

Exploration done by other parties

·   Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

·     N/A

Geology

·   Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

·      The lithium mineralization is predominantly in the form of Spodumene-bearing pegmatites which are hosted in meta-pelitic and mica schists, and occasionally carbonate schists of upper Ordovician to lower Devonian age. The pegmatites are unzoned and vary in thickness from 15m-39m. Lithium is present in most aplite compositions.

Drill hole Information

·   A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

o dip and azimuth of the hole

o down hole length and interception depth

o hole length.

·   If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

·      Grid used WSG84

·      No material data has been excluded from the release

Hole ID

East

North

RL

Depth (m)

Azim

Dip

17NOARC01

599254

4609428

688

60

202

-60

17NOARC02

599266

4609457

683

101

205

-60

17NOARC03

599147

4609440

689

50

204

-60

17NOARC04

599158

4609482

678

93

205

-60

17RESRC09

599676

4609138

599

75

152

-60

17RESRC10

599657

4609173

609

95

152

-60

17RESRC11

599591

4609117

613

113

152

-60

17RESRC12

599614

4609078

603

85

152

-60

17RESRC13

599635

4609046

602

55

152

-60

17RESRC14

599566

4609002

599

92

137

-60

17NOARC05

599103

4609401

687

80

27

-60

17GRARC10

602012

4607893

579

73

0

-90

17GRARC11

602040

4607961

579

50

0

-90

17GRARC12

601888

4607968

570

50

0

-90

17GRARC13

601900

4608000

582

75

0

-90

17RESRC15

599522

4609069

620

126

147

-60

17RESRC16

599544

4609031

609

110

142

-60

17RESRC17

599573

4609148

629

136

152

-60

17RESRC18

599631

4609205

622

125

152

-60

17RESRC19

599608

4609242

627

152

152

-60

17RESRC20

599553

4609184

631

158

153

-60

17GRARC14

601886

4608085

574

114

30

-60

17GRARC15

601848

4607996

582

78

0

-90

17GRARC16

601863

4607955

554

60

0

-90

17GRARC17

601786

4607991

557

108

0

-90

17GRARC18

601846

4608132

546

63

30

-60

17GRARC19

601778

4607968

497

189

0

-90

 

 

Data aggregation methods

·   In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

·   Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

·   The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

·      Low Grade Intercepts are weighted averages using a 0.2%Li2O cut off with no more than 2m of internal dilution

·      High Grade Intercepts are weighted averages using a 0.5%Li2O cut off with no more than 2m of internal dilution

 

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

·   These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

·   If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

·   If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').

·      Exploration results are reported as down hole intercepts

·      No metal equivalent values have been used.

·      The drill holes are detailed in the table in the main release and the pegmatite at Reservatorio appears to dip at around 40degrees to the north west and at Grandao it is sub horizontal

Diagrams

·   Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

·      Relevant diagrams and maps have been included in the main body of the release.

Balanced reporting

·   Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

·      All relevant results available have been reported.

Other substantive exploration data

·   Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

·      The interpretation of the results is consistent with the observations and information obtained from the data collected.

Further work

·   The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

·   Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

·      Further rock chip sampling, channel sampling and RC drilling. Once planning has been completed the detail will be provided

       

 

 


This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
UPDFESFWFFWSELF